FILE - This is an undated photo provided by the Ohio Dept. of Rehabilitation and Corrections shows Michael Webb, scheduled to be executed next month for the arson death of his 3-year-old son two decades ago. Webb doesn?t dispute the blaze was arson, but denies starting the fire and says investigators using now-discredited methods came to the wrong conclusion about where in the house it may have broken out. It was a mistake that he says points to someone else as the culprit. (AP Photo/Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction)
FILE - This is an undated photo provided by the Ohio Dept. of Rehabilitation and Corrections shows Michael Webb, scheduled to be executed next month for the arson death of his 3-year-old son two decades ago. Webb doesn?t dispute the blaze was arson, but denies starting the fire and says investigators using now-discredited methods came to the wrong conclusion about where in the house it may have broken out. It was a mistake that he says points to someone else as the culprit. (AP Photo/Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction)
FILE - In this undated file photo, Han Tak Lee gestures at an unknown location in Pennsylvania. The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Lee, imprisoned for life, can present evidence backing up his claim the July 1989 fire that killed his 20-year-old daughter in a cabin at a religious retreat was an accident. (AP Photo/The Philadelphia Inquirer, Todd Buchanan, File) MAGS OUT; NO SALES; TV OUT; NEWARK OUT
FILE - This undated file photo provided by the Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice shows Cameron Todd Willingham who was executed in 2004 for setting fire to his Corsicana house, killing his 2-year-old daughter and 1-year-old twins. Stacy Kuykendall, In one of the highest-profile innocence claims to death, arson experts questioned the evidence used to gain Cameron Todd Willingham's Texas conviction for a 1991 fire that killed his three daughters. The Texas State Fire Marshal's Office stood by its findings and Willingham was executed Feb. 17, 2004, but experts since then have testified the fire was accidental. (AP Photo/File)
COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) ? A death row inmate's theory that a mysterious "man in red" could have started the arson fire that killed his 3-year-old son is "an extraordinary stretch of the imagination," the state parole board ruled Wednesday in unanimously rejecting his plea for mercy.
Michael Webb doesn't dispute the 1990 blaze was arson, but he denies starting it and says investigators using now-discredited methods came to the wrong conclusion about where in the house the flames broke out. He says the correct determination points to someone else as the culprit.
Investigators say Webb set the fire to kill his family, collect the insurance and start a new life with his mistress.
The Webb case is one in a series of cases around the U.S. that represents a new legal frontier: Defense attorneys in Iowa, Massachusetts, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Texas and other states are using advances in the science of fire investigation to challenge arson convictions, in much the same way they are employing DNA to clear those in prison for murder and rape.
The board called Webb's theory of an alternate suspect who could have entered the house undetected "an extraordinary stretch of the imagination."
"Given the overwhelming evidence of guilt, there is no manifest injustice in this case that would warrant the grant of executive clemency," the board said.
Clermont County prosecutor Don White said Wednesday that he wasn't surprised because he always thought Webb's claim was meritless. Messages left with Webb's attorney weren't immediately returned.
Gov. John Kasich has the final say on clemency for Webb, whose execution is on hold because of an unrelated lawsuit over lethal injection.
Research in recent decades has challenged long-held assumptions about how flames spread and the tell-tale signs they leave.
"Our scientific understandings have improved in recent years, and the effect of that has to be to say, 'We've got some innocent people who've been declared guilty based on misunderstandings,'" said John Hall, director of analysis and research for the National Fire Protection Association.
For example, decades ago, it was common for investigators to conclude an accelerant like gasoline was used if a fire burned particularly hot. In fact, the new arson science has found no such correlation, experts say. Another mistaken assumption: A V-shaped pattern on a wall of a burned building is proof of arson. All it shows is where a fire started.
In Ohio, Webb's chief argument is that a fire investigator wrongly concluded that the 1990 blaze started near a closet or a bathroom where Webb acknowledged he was standing.
In a report submitted on Webb's behalf earlier this month, Gerald Hurst, a chemist and fire investigator in Austin, Texas, said that based on gasoline-spill experiments conducted around the U.S. in the years since the crime, the origin of the fire could have been anywhere on the main floor.
That is important to Webb's case because of statements by one of his teenage daughters that she saw "a man in red" in the house the morning of the fire. Webb's attorneys argue that that person could have been the boyfriend of Webb's other daughter.
Webb's lawyers acknowledge Hurst's findings don't exonerate Webb, but say they raise enough questions to justify a new trial.
Prosecutors dismiss the "man in red" theory, saying the girl's statements varied, that no evidence implicating the boyfriend was found, and that the daughter could have actually seen Webb holding a red gas can. They say Webb is presenting nothing new.
Webb is making "a contention of innocence that is refuted by the hard evidence in the case," Clermont County prosecutors said in their filing with the parole board.
___
Andrew Welsh-Huggins can be reached at http://twitter.com/awhcolumbus.
Associated Pressbig ten acc challenge scott disick kourtney kardashian kourtney kardashian lipitor lipitor kourtney kardashian pregnant again
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.